This source is reliable because it was written by a war hero which had a positive attitude towards the soldiers at the western front. But this conflict quickly became the most brutal war in history and not even the most seasoned serviceman was prepared for the scale of carnage bloodshed that unfolded before him.
Another historian, named Gary Sheffield, who sees Haig in a more positive light, also praised Haig. Historians such as Sir John French have criticised Haig for gaining his promotions and respect through luck and fortune.
Prior to publication in a letter to Hugh Trevor Roperhe asked "English soldiers, lions led by donkeys etc - can you remember who said that? This quote tells us that if there were heavy losses in men and material for the Germans, this must have been due to the good organisation of the generals.
More essays like this: They must have made the statue because they thought Haig was a good leader who enabled in the victory of World War 1. Attacks did become less costly with better training and technology being introduced and eventually the war was won.
One historian wrote that "the idea that they were indifferent to the sufferings of their men is constantly refuted by the facts, and only endures because some commentators wish to perpetuate the myth that these generals, representing the upper classes, did not give a damn what happened to the lower orders".
It was almost five months that it took to lift the pressure off of Verdun with hundreds of thousands of soldiers dying and barely any more land being gained.
This held his strong likening to the use of cavalry in the war. Generals were under a lot of pressure. Source B4ii Haig gives his own opinion on how the battle went which were Germans have surrendering freely and the troops are full of confidence.
We should have no chance if they possessed as much science as their officers and men had of courage and bravery. I think it was written to try to make people feel sorry for him, and make people dislike General Haig because his friends were killed.
He is better known as the general who planned the Somme Offensive of He was known as an efficient officer who looked after his men. They are lions led by donkeys.
If they made careful decisions they should know the outcomes and not question their decisions. Before the Battle of the Somme, the generals provided the soldiers with plenty of encouragement and assured their troops that the shells would destroy the enemy before the men went into battle.
But the army could no more afford to carry cowards than it could traitors, and many of those who did flee faced death and torture: They were never safe and would have to live in the fear of being gassed or shelled.
Secondly source B2 is about a letter from King George V to Sir Douglas Haig talking about how well Haig did during the war and that he has the full support of his soldiers. How to cite this page Choose cite format: It does not help being doubted by people around you particularly politicians.
Instead he preferred the comforts of his chateau well in the rear. I believe this source is reliable to a certain point because both men were probably under command by General Haig at some point during war.
Despite his lack in knowledge of fighting the type of war he was thrust into, he managed to adapt and learn from mistakes over the years.
I believe instead of there just being the one statue of General Haig there should still be his but around it statues of ordinary soldiers too so it shows fellowship and co operation between a general and his troops.
In conclusion it is evident that methods of attack were frivolous and expensive in the cost of lives. Field Marshall Haig was 54 in age and was a great cavalry commander in the Boer War which had taken place fifteen years earlier.
This tells us that generals were wise because of the planning they did for such a successful result. They also earned themselves a bad reputation for not personally visiting the frontline.
Nevertheless the public were quick to criticise when really no one knew how to fight a war like it as it was a new experience in warfare and so no one could offer alternatives in that moment of time.The question “were the British soldiers ‘Lions led by Donkeys?'” has been an ongoing debate since the end of the war.
A war which is dominated by images of bloody battles such as the Somme and Passchendaele – futile frontal attacks against the machine guns. Lions Led by Donkeys Essay How accurate is the It supports the view that lions were led by donkeys as it implies that Haig thought his own comfort was more important than the situation at the front line.
Randale Wallace was the writer and director of the film. The well-known statement from World War I the allied troops were like “Lions led by donkeys” is related to the bravery and fearlessness that the soldiers fought with.
Lion Led by Donkeys Essay Sample. Introduction. In my essay, I shall be interpret ting why so many people believe “Lions led by Donkeys” was just idiotic generals leading his own soldiers in to a cold blooded war, which led to thousands of deaths and even more distraught families.
"Lions led by donkeys" is a phrase popularly used to describe the British infantry of the First World War and to blame the generals who led them. The contention is that the brave soldiers (lions) were sent to their deaths by incompetent and indifferent leaders (donkeys).
. Essay on The British Army were lions led by donkeys; Essay on The British Army were lions led by donkeys. Submitted By DawidOpalka. Words: Pages: 5. Open Document.
The First World War was one of the bloodiest wars that ever happened in human history. This War started in and ended in In this war, a lot of horrifying battles took.Download